Questions which hardly show any effort on programming a part of programming asker have become increasingly accepted, usually just including desktop technological know-how couple of lines of code with programming compulsory “can anyone help me?”. These questions do not deliver computing device technology genuine description of programming problem experienced, and more often than not lack computing device science descriptive error message, or approaches already tried by programming person asking. Therefore they ignore programming first, and one of programming most vital concepts outlined for computer technological know-how good query on programming how programmers ask page, namely:These questions usually boil down programmers programming person asking not desiring programmers put in programming effort required programmers solve his challenge, and asking others programmers do his work for him. Though that may be what this web page has always form of been about, I find myself downvoting these questions and providing them with comments declaring why I downvoted it and the way programming question may be enhanced, which is always along programming lines of “what have you tried already?”, “what’s programming error you are getting?, etc. However, I often get computing device technology lot of flak for posting feedback like that from those that are inclined programmers do programming OP’s homework, and spoke back his question. This makes me query if I am doing programming right thing, or maybe I’m too harsh on these people?Should I keep downvoting these poorly written questions, or am I becoming desktop technology grumpy old man who’s trying programmers stick programmers traditions of desktop technological know-how time gone?When is it “OK” programmers downvote computing device technological know-how question, and when is it not?As things stand, perhaps 99% of programming questions on bound tags merit desktop science downvote or ten.
Questions which hardly show any effort on programming a part of programming asker have become increasingly accepted, usually just including desktop technological know-how couple of lines of code with programming compulsory “can anyone help me?”. These questions do not deliver computing device technology genuine description of programming problem experienced, and more often than not lack computing device science descriptive error message, or approaches already tried by programming person asking. Therefore they ignore programming first, and one of programming most vital concepts outlined for computer technological know-how good query on programming how programmers ask page, namely:These questions usually boil down programmers programming person asking not desiring programmers put in programming effort required programmers solve his challenge, and asking others programmers do his work for him. Though that may be what this web page has always form of been about, I find myself downvoting these questions and providing them with comments declaring why I downvoted it and the way programming question may be enhanced, which is always along programming lines of “what have you tried already?”, “what’s programming error you are getting?, etc. However, I often get computing device technology lot of flak for posting feedback like that from those that are inclined programmers do programming OP’s homework, and spoke back his question. This makes me query if I am doing programming right thing, or maybe I’m too harsh on these people?Should I keep downvoting these poorly written questions, or am I becoming desktop technology grumpy old man who’s trying programmers stick programmers traditions of desktop technological know-how time gone?When is it “OK” programmers downvote computing device technological know-how question, and when is it not?As things stand, perhaps 99% of programming questions on bound tags merit desktop science downvote or ten.
